Through a questionable column published in the newspaper Clarin, Jorge Lanata again compare the dictatorship that led the recently deceased, Jorge Rafael Videla, with the government of Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner.

According to the orchestrator of the media show that broadcasts Clarín group, the current government in which he was elected with 54% of the votes, there are "things of the military dictatorship" to "survive in an authoritarian democracy".

However, this is not the only thing emerges from the publisher of Lanata: your column contains the phrase under which, not coincidentally, both the Clarin and La Nacion put at the top of this Saturday to portray the death of Videla. "Yesterday died a symbol of the dictatorship of 1976, perhaps the greatest" Lanata drafted in the second paragraph. The same word used La Nacion and Clarin to qualify the genocidal died.

"Died Videla, the symbol of dictatorship", identically titled newspapers Clarin and La Nacion. The only textual difference in the two is that the morning of Ernestina Noble included the adjective "military" frase.De down the entire semantic field which could be brought under Jorge Rafael Videla, Lanta, Clarin and La Nacion, chose qualify of "symbol." Videla not the "symbol" is the dictator, is one of the leading makers and executors of the bloodiest dictatorship joint manner could gestate a sector of the business, the church, some political parties and militatres .

The former general Jorge Videla not only the reference or the "symbol", but one of the most responsible and ideologues of the arrests, torture and disappearances that arose against pueblo.Además, Lanata column in the newspaper media octopus, also remember that there were links between Videla and Ernestina Noble.

Neither had the dictatorship favors for the day that capped state terrorism apocryphal information for those años.De this way, instead of remembering the victims of the atrocities being executed Rafael Videla in power, or to question the complicity of media entrepreneurs who got rich during those years, preferred Lanata comparisons riding a circus to hit the Government unsustainable.

According to the orchestrator of the media show that broadcasts Clarín group, the current Government was elected with 54% of the votes, there are "things of the military dictatorship" to "survive in an authoritarian democracy". Something similar ran Friday on his radio show.

However, this is not the only feature that protrudes from the publisher Lanata. In addition, your column contains the phrase under which, not coincidentally, both the Clarin as The Nation titled cover this Saturday to portray the death of Videla.

"Yesterday died a symbol of the dictatorship of 1976, perhaps the greatest" Lanata drafted in the second paragraph. The same word used La Nacion and Clarin to qualify the genocidal deceased: I tried to "symbol".



"Died Videla, the symbol of dictatorship", identically titled newspapers Clarin and La Nacion on Saturday. The only textual difference between the two is that the morning of Ernestina Noble included the adjective "military" at the end of the sentence.

Of all the semantic field that could occur under Jorge Rafael Videla, Lanta, Clarin and La Nacion, chose qualify for "symbol".

Videla is the "symbol" is the dictator, is one of the main culprits and perpetrators of the bloodiest dictatorship so they could gestate a sector of the business jointly, the church, some political parties and militatres.

The former general Jorge Videla not only the reference or the "symbol", but one of the most responsible and ideologues of the arrests, torture and disappearances that arose against the people.

In addition, the column in the newspaper Lanata media octopus, also remember that there were links between Videla and Ernestina Noble. Neither had the dictatorship favors for the day that capped state terrorism apocryphal information during those years.

Thus, instead of remembering the victims of the atrocities that Rafael Videla executed when he was in power, or to question the complicity of media entrepreneurs who got rich during those years riding a circus preferred Lanata comparisons to hit unsustainable the Government.

Source: Journal Registrado.com